2 min readfrom Data Science

AI isn’t making data science interviews easier.

I sit in hiring loops for data science/analytics roles, and I see a lot of discussion lately about AI “making interviews obsolete” or “making prep pointless.” From the interviewer side, that’s not what’s happening.

There’s a lot of posts about how you can easily generate a SQL query or even a full analysis plan using AI, but it only means we make interviews harder and more intentional, i.e. focusing more on how you think rather than whether you can come up with the correct/perfect answers.

Some concrete shifts I’ve seen mainly include SQL interviews getting a lot of follow-ups, like assumptions about the data or how you’d explain query limitations to a PM/the rest of the team.

For modeling questions, the focus is more on judgment. So don’t just practice answering which model you’d use, but also think about how to communicate constraints, failure modes, trade-offs, etc.

Essentially, don’t just rely on AI to generate answers. You still have to do the explaining and thinking yourself, and that requires deeper practice.

I’m curious though how data science/analytics candidates are experiencing this. Has anything changed with your interview experience in light of AI? Have you adapted your interview prep to accommodate this shift (if any)?

submitted by /u/KitchenTaste7229
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#conversational data analysis
#data analysis tools
#big data management in spreadsheets
#real-time data collaboration
#intelligent data visualization
#data visualization tools
#enterprise data management
#big data performance
#data cleaning solutions
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#self-service analytics tools
#predictive analytics in spreadsheets
#predictive analytics
#self-service analytics
#rows.com
#financial modeling